The Uncommon Life

Paid Family Leave: Why it Matters

May 12, 2017

You may have seen the Paid Family Leave page in our Mother’s and Father’s Day print catalogs. What “Paid Family Leave” means is this: family members can go on leave from work to take care of a newborn or seriously ill family member for a period of time, while continuing to receive some or all of their usual pay and benefits. The United States doesn’t have a paid family leave policy–we’re one of the only countries in the world that doesn’t, and the only developed country–and we are for changing that. We decided we wanted to advocate for it in our catalog.

Source: United States Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics

We’ve always been a socially conscious company, working to use business as a force for good. But this is the first time we’ve communicated to our customers directly about a specific issue. We’re excited about it and a little nervous. We know not everyone will agree. We’re not trying to tell people what to think. What we’re hoping to do is raise awareness and build resources to take action.

Candace Holloway, our Senior Merchant Manager, gave birth to her first child two months ago. UncommonGoods had just revised our family leave policy a month before, making it more generous. Candace, who is still at home, wrote us,

There is so much excitement but also so many stresses when growing a family. I am thankful that I got to focus on how to keep the little guy happy rather than falling behind in my career or how I was going to pay for the hundreds of diapers he needs (this is a literal estimate). The bonding and learning we both are doing is crucial to my entire family’s development. I miss my work and my coworkers, but glad I can put my family first. I get to spend twelve amazing weeks with my boy. I am so grateful to be working at a company that supports paid family leave, and to live in a state that does as well.

Our country already has federal family leave regulations which add some costs to businesses. The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), passed in 1993, requires companies over a certain size to preserve the jobs and group health benefits of qualified employees while they take up to twelve weeks of unpaid leave. But because of various limitations, 40 percent of US workers have no job-protected leave of any kind.1

Source: United States Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics

The FMLA is also out of date, in that it doesn’t take into account the way the typical American family has changed over the last few decades. Back in the day, Grandma and Grandpa were there to help with childcare when a baby arrived. Dad went to work while Mom stayed home. Now, all the adults likely have careers, Grandma and Grandpa live in different states, and Mom is the sole or primary breadwinner in 40 percent of households with children.2

One thing that hasn’t changed: newborns still need round-the-clock care, and mothers need time to recover from childbirth.

As we mentioned above, earlier this year, we updated our own paid leave policies at UncommonGoods, which cover new parent leave, family medical leave, and personal medical leave. Through these policies, eligible employees who need to take leave from work are offered 100 percent of their regular weekly pay and the continuation of certain benefits.

Source: Pew Research Center

Our paid new parent leave is gender neutral. Team members who are designated as the Primary Caregiver are eligible to take up to eight weeks, and the designated Secondary Caregiver can take up to three, both at full pay. For team members who need to take time off to care for a seriously ill loved one, or for a personal medical issue, we offer up to three weeks of paid family or personal medical leave.

These benefits don’t just help employees; they’re good for the company as a whole. We work hard and long to find the right team members to fit our company culture and each specific role, and of course it takes every new hire a while to get into the flow of their job. We don’t want to lose those people!

To update the current federal law, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) and Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) have re-introduced the Family and Medical Insurance Leave Act, or FAMILY Act, which would provide up to twelve weeks of paid leave each year to qualifying workers for the birth or adoption of a new child, the serious illness of an immediate family member, or a worker’s own medical condition. Workers would be eligible to collect benefits equal to 66 percent of their typical monthly wages, up to a monthly maximum of $1,000 per week.

Employees and employers would each contribute 0.2 percent of wages, averaging about $2.00 per week from a worker’s paycheck. As with Social Security taxes, wages would be taxed up to a cap of $127,000, so the maximum contribution for a high-wage earner would be $254.00 a year. (Compare this to the $9,316 in wages the typical family would lose if one parent takes twelve weeks off to care for a new baby.)3

Source: United States Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics

A handful of individual US states—California, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and Washington, plus the District of Columbia—have taken the lead on paid family leave legislation for their residents. Our own CEO, Dave Bolotsky, was an active supporter of paid family leave in New York State. Each state handles it a little differently; in New York, for example, leave will be 100 percent worker funded, with average weekly contributions of about $1.40 to $2.80 per week from a worker’s paycheck, according to various estimates.

We want to help more states pass these laws.“We’ve been practicing but not preaching to our customers. Now we’re preaching what we’re practicing.” (Dave said that. He has a way with words.) With the help of Family Values @ Work, a network of coalitions in 25 states working to pass paid leave policies, we made an easy-to-use interactive US map that gives very brief info on the status of paid family leave in each state, and who to contact if you want to learn more and help back paid family leave law in your state.

As we said, we know not everyone agrees with us. It’s sparked honest conversations, both in favor and against this policy. We want to address some of the common concerns and counterpoints that have come up.

Source: Pew Research Center

People sometimes feel that businesses should not stick their noses into policy outside of their own firm. So why are we?

Businesses get involved with policy all the time. That’s what lobbying is. But usually, businesses lobby for policy that helps their bottom line: lower taxes, fewer environmental regulations, subsidies, etc. As a B Corp, it’s part of our mission to get involved with issues we care about beyond our bottom line. We believe that paid family leave is good for our country and its economy. And as a business, it’s an issue we deal with in our everyday lives. Why should we leave it to politicians?

Moreover, families are important to us, and to our business. People very often give UncommonGoods items as gifts to family members. We read customer reviews about how someone’s mother, grandfather, or child reacted to a gift with delight, or even tears of joy. It’s very moving to us. We care about the families of our customers, our team, and our makers. But why stop there?

Not having paid family leave is very tough on most families. Without it—and 86 percent of Americans don’t get it4—the birth of a child can cause a financial crisis for a family, even when the birth goes perfectly and baby and mother are both healthy. As a result, nearly one in four women with jobs go back to work within two weeks of delivery–or have to quit their jobs.5 We don’t think that’s a good thing.

(Just a thought: Parents aren’t sleeping much after their child is born, anyway. Do you really want them going right back to work, making your food, doing your blood tests, entering the data of your stock trades, repairing your car or the plane you’re flying in, etc.? We don’t.)

The people who do have paid family leave generally have higher paying jobs to begin with. That’s why Dave believes that the point of paid family leave is equality of opportunity. “The current law offers nothing for the people earning the least,” he says. “It’s unconscionable. And it affects women more.”

It’s important to keep in mind that paid family leave is not just about childbirth. Elderly family members need care, too. Sean Cullen, our Human Resources Project Coordinator, helped care for his grandmother before he came to UncommonGoods.

As my grandmother’s memory began to drastically decline, my family stepped in to be her caretakers. In order to help, I managed to receive a teaching assistantship that allowed for me to stay with her during traditional working hours while my mother was able to keep her job and her paycheck. Two years later, as my grandmother’s physical health began to worsen, it was apparent how fortunate we were to have a support system in place for the weeks leading up to hospice. Not all American families have that opportunity to do right by their loved ones. I wouldn’t trade in those difficult moments for the world; others shouldn’t have to in order to keep food on their table and a roof over their head.

The US population is aging. The number of Americans who rely on long-term care services will more than double by 2050, from 12 million to 27 million.6 Most rely on family members, 62 percent of whom keep their full-time jobs rather than taking unpaid leave.7 Paid family leave would help elderly people stay in their own homes, cared for by family members, rather than move into expensive, often taxpayer-funded institutions.

Source: Pew Research Center

Those who aren’t sold on paid family leave sometimes think it’s too hard on businesses, especially small ones, and that that causes problems for consumers too, in the form of higher prices. Even if leave is employee-funded, businesses still have to pay overtime to coworkers who pitch in to cover for the worker on leave, or hire temporary replacement help.

That last part is true, as we know from our own experience. But reduced turnover costs more than make up for it. How do we know? In California, the law has mandated up to six weeks of paid leave for more than a decade. 89 to 99 percent of California companies, many of which lobbied against the law, now say it has had a positive or no effect on productivity, profitability, turnover, and morale.8

That’s because paid family leave is pragmatic, not pie in the sky. It’s meant to provide business owners with a method to cost-effectively provide paid leave to workers, while workers are able to care for their loved ones and still pay their bills.

Some people say it’s a personal decision to have a child and that only the people having the child should bear the financial and other responsibilities of that decision.

Well, it’s not a personal decision on the child’s part. And nobody decides to have parents or a spouse become very ill. It just happens.

As for the people who are doing the choosing, in the United States, most people do eventually have children. Those kids become our workers, our doctors, our teachers, our thinkers—or, our problems. We want them to be strong, smart, and good at their jobs, and to add strength to our nation, not rely on taxpayer money.

Families who have access to paid family leave are healthier, more economically secure, and less likely to require taxpayer-funded public assistance resources. In New Jersey, in the year after giving birth, women who take paid leave have been about 40 percent less likely to receive public aid or food stamps.9

As Dr. Mauricio Avendano, an adjunct associate professor for the Harvard School of Public Health, puts it, “This is really what economists call a human capital investment…The effects of maternity leave benefits are not only short-lived … they are likely to extend for many decades.”

We’re proud of being uncommon. But we’re not proud that the US is uncommon in not having paid family leave.

As we noted above, the US is the only developed nation that doesn’t offer national paid leave. In fact, every country on earth, with a handful of tiny exceptions, has found a way to make it work. The first eight, all together, have a total of eight million people: Papua New Guinea (where a large proportion of the population is illiterate, and some localities still use sea shells as currency), Suriname, Micronesia, Marshall Islands, Nauru, Niue, Palau, and Tonga. Number nine: That’s us, the 320 million people of the United States.10

For comparison, here are the top five most generous national family leave policies.

Source: Business Insider

Why do we make it so hard to be successful at both family and career in our country, when that’s what almost everybody wants most? Who is saying it can’t work here, and why are they saying it?

Americans have long thought of these as personal problems, not public policy challenges. As Ellen Bravo, Co-Director of Family Values @ Work, puts it, “When so many people face financial hardship for being a good parent to their child or a good child to an ailing parent, they start to realize this isn’t a personal failure. It’s a systems failure. Fortunately, we know what a policy solution looks like. And across the spectrum, support for that policy is growing.”

The time is ripe. Public support for a federal paid family leave program is widespread and bipartisan.11 So let’s do this!


[1] US Department of Labor, FMLA Surveys: FMLA is Working, Wage and Hour Division, February 2013, “Detailed Results Appendix.”

[2] Pew Research Center, analysis of data from the US Census Bureau. “Breadwinner Moms,” by Wendy Wang, Kim Parker and Paul Taylor, 2013

[3]  American Progress, calculation based on Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Current Population Survey: Median Usual Weekly Earnings, Employed Full Time, Wage and Salary Workers, 2012 Annual Average

[4] US Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2016, September). National Compensation Survey: Employee Benefits in the United States, March 2016 (Table 32)

[5] US Department of Labor, FMLA Surveys: FMLA is Working, Wage and Hour Division, February 2013, “Detailed Results Appendix.”

[6] Health Affairs.  “Long-Term Care: Who Gets It, Who Provides It, Who Pays, And How Much?” By  Kaye H, Harrington C, LaPlante M. Health Affairs. January 2010; 29(1):11-21.

[7] Caring Across Generations, “Who makes up our nation’s family caregivers?”

[8] Center for Economic and Policy Research. “Leaves That Pay: Employer and Worker Experiences With Paid Family Leave in California“, 2011 (updated 2012).” By Eileen Appelbaum and Ruth Milkman.

[9] Center for Women and Work at Rutgers. “Pay Matters: The Positive Economic Impacts of Paid Family Leave for Families, Businesses and the Public,” By  Linda Houser and Thomas Vartanian, 2012.

[10] World Policy Analysis Center, Comparative International Data Tables. “Policy: Is paid Leave Available for Mothers of Infants” Database methodology information here.

[11] An AARP-commissioned survey of voters 50 and older across New York state in 2014 found 73 percent support paid family leave. AARP Research, “2014 State of the 50+ in New York State,” by Angela Houghton, page 11.



  • Reply Erin McKee May 24, 2017 at 1:16 pm

    I am thrilled to see you educating people and taking a stand on paid sick leave, going to forward to all my friends and tell them this is a good company to buy from as they share our values.

    • Reply Marisa June 7, 2017 at 11:12 am

      Thank you, Erin! As we said, it’s new for us to bring a discussion of a specific issue to our customers. We’re happy to hear that you appreciate it. And by all means, forward to your friends–not just so that they buy from us, but to help people learn more about paid family leave and what they can do to help make it law, if they choose to.

  • Reply Key Grove May 24, 2017 at 1:29 pm

    Paid family leave should be a choice for businesses as a means of both financial and non-financial compensation to offer valued employees. To force that cost upon businesses is un-American and immoral. When this country was founded we were an “uncommon” country in that we did not seek to force upon others things they had no choice in. If I get an exceptional education then I can work for a company that offers these benefits. That’s up to me, and up to the company that I choose to work for. Social justice is everyone having the same basic opportunity as everyone else. It’s not a bunch of hand-outs that are paid for by the most successful in our society.

    • Reply Marisa June 7, 2017 at 11:20 am

      Thank you, Ken. We’re grateful to you for sharing your views on this. We do want to clarify that in New York State, employers won’t be responsible for the cost of paid family leave. A small deduction will be taken from employee paychecks, similar to the way Social Security works. We think this is a good model. We also believe, based on extensive studies of California (which has had paid leave since 2004), that paid family leave would actually make things easier and less costly for businesses, especially small ones. Turnover costs are lower, for example. We invite you to check out some of the information sources we linked to in our post. You may be surprised by what you find!

  • Reply Cyndi May 24, 2017 at 2:33 pm

    Well said, Key Grove – I agree. If the government continually hands out aid and in this case, forces companies to do so, it creates a society where people are happy to sit back with their hand out instead of encouraging them to contribute their best to themselves and to society as a whole. There needs to be accountability for oneself. One of the examples provided here is Denmark, a country that has become a cradle to grave welfare state. Denmark and their educational system is an example of what does not work and it has weakened their economy further. No tuition fees and generous monthly stipends have resulted in Denmark spending more on education than most other countries but has produced students pursuing fields of study that,while interesting to them and free, do not provide them with a sustainable way to support themselves. This results in shortages of qualified workers in various fields which further hurts their economy. The other piece of this is that, inevitably, taxes will rise to pay for such programs – taxes are close to 60% in Denmark for top earners. This is but one example. It’s not a business model that works and I do not want to see it happen in the US. Less government is needed, not more. By the way, I love the products I’ve purchased from Uncommon Goods!

    • Reply Marisa June 7, 2017 at 11:28 am

      Thanks for the compliment, Cyndi–both about our goods, and the compliment you pay us by engaging in dialogue about this issue with us. We share your concern about values, incentives, productivity, and allocation of resources. You make some fascinating observations that make us want to learn more. As for financing paid family leave, there are many different models for how that can be done. For small businesses, it comes down to the dilemma of cost vs benefit. If sustainably funded, paid leave can be a modest program with long lasting benefits for people who you have invested valuable hours training and recruiting employees, in turn creating loyalty and financial incentive for knowledgeable employees to return to work. We look forward to hearing and learning more from our customers, so thanks again for your feedback.

  • Reply Ann May 24, 2017 at 2:35 pm

    While the idea is commendable, many small businesses simply cannot afford to pay an employee while they are out on leave for two months and hire another person to replace the person on leave. In larger companies there may be more flexibility to cover the work normally done by the employee who is out.

    I support giving employees time off to care for family, but the cost of paid leave may be prohibitive to many companies. I think FMLA was made law for this reason.

    • Reply Marisa June 7, 2017 at 11:07 am

      Thank you for responding, Ann. We’re happy that our blog post has inspired you to give us your POV. For us, part of the point of Paid Family Leave is that it would make it easier, not harder, for small businesses to give their employees that time off, because they wouldn’t have to shoulder the cost of it. In New York, for example, leave will be paid with a very small weekly deduction from workers’ paychecks. Employers won’t have to contribute anything. This way, when an employee goes on family leave, the employer pays only the temporary replacement employee, rather than paying both employees simultaneously. That puts smaller businesses on a level playing ground with big ones that, as you say, have more flexibility to cover the work, and can more easily afford to pay leave. Thanks again for writing. And feel free to disagree with us!

    Leave a Reply

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.